Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    6:56 AM

GasBuddy News Article

24
votes
Taxpayers are likely losers in first GM stock offering

USA Today -- American taxpayers are likely to be losers when it comes to the first public offering of General Motors stock, Reuters is reporting.

Reuters, quoting six unnamed people, says the initial round is likely to be priced below what would be needed to put the the federal government on track to make a full recovery of the $50 billiion it sunk into GM last year to try to save it. But in later years, subsequent offerings may be priced at levels that would allow taxpayers to be fully paid back for saving the world's largest automaker.

The Treasury could take three years to sell down its remaining shares in GM, well into the next presidential term, and it would be years as well before taxpayers are made whole, if they ever are, on their investment, the news agency says.


Read the Full Article

Submitted Sep 07, 2010 By: BurntOrange
Category: Daily News Article Discussions > Topics Add to favorite topics  
Author Topic: Taxpayers are likely losers in first GM stock offering Post a Reply Back to Topics
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
Sneakers55
Champion Author Houston

Posts:43,327
Points:1,711,955
Joined:Nov 2005
Message Posted: Sep 8, 2010 11:29:21 PM

latruck wrote:

>Some people just do not like American companys

No problem here with American companies, just GM.

>remember the old saying , what is good for GM, is good for America..

The old saying got munged in translation. Hangar queen cars are not good for America. We have better things to do than wait for Mr. Goodwrench.

>Believe in America. Auto workers pay 40% taxes roughly,payroll,sales, gas, ss etc,

Retire. Go into a lower income tax bracket. Have most if not all of your income be FICA exempt.

>I'm happy to pay my taxes , a proud American

No more bailouts, taxed enough already. Let Government Motors liquidate next time.



[Edited by: Sneakers55 at 9/9/2010 12:34:24 AM EST]
Profile Pic
latruck
Rookie Author Indianapolis

Posts:6
Points:158,345
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Sep 8, 2010 6:01:18 PM

Some people just do not like American companys, remember the old saying , what is good for GM, is good for America.. Believe in America. Auto workers pay 40% taxes roughly,payroll,sales, gas, ss etc, I'm happy to pay my taxes , a proud American
Profile Pic
Sneakers55
Champion Author Houston

Posts:43,327
Points:1,711,955
Joined:Nov 2005
Message Posted: Sep 8, 2010 5:42:43 PM

Night Owl wrote:

>If it weren't for the taxpayers, GM would have gone bankrupt. You would
>think that GM would be grateful to the U.S. and Canadian taxpayers that
>saved them. GM should ensure that taxpayers are fully paid back.

GM doesn't have to ensure that taxpayers are fully paid back.

It's TARP money.

Our Government took unregistered stock in return for cash.

It'll be interesting what GM's top management has to say in the roadshow.

The S-1 does have a HUGE number of reasons not to purchase GM stock.
Profile Pic
Sneakers55
Champion Author Houston

Posts:43,327
Points:1,711,955
Joined:Nov 2005
Message Posted: Sep 8, 2010 1:47:50 PM

Martinman wrote:

>Second, virtually all major auto manufacturers are multi-national corporations. The difference is in where they
>are headquartered. That is where the profits are funneled, and a majority of research, design, and testing are
>done.

The last I read on the subject, GM established three global design centers. Opel (GM Europe) got the FWD cars, Holden (GM Australia) got the RWD cars, and GM North America does trucks.

>Third, to make the assertion that a majority of the parts in all GM vehicles are made in China is an extreme
>stretch at best. Okay, how about an outright lie.

There's legal language controlled by the Federal Trade Commission here. When all they can say is "globally sourced parts," it's a really good indication they came from elsewhere. Specifically, they can't qualify for "assembled in the United States from domestic and foreign parts" as that requires more domestic parts than GM is willing to do.
Profile Pic
Sneakers55
Champion Author Houston

Posts:43,327
Points:1,711,955
Joined:Nov 2005
Message Posted: Sep 8, 2010 12:13:40 PM

Martinman wrote:

>General Motors has more vehicle assembly plants and parts manufacturing plants
>in the U.S. than any other auto manufacturer.

They should, they still hang onto a #1 market share (mostly through moving a lot of unprofitable fleet business through the plants to keep them running). And I thought most of the parts plants were spun off to Delphi.

They have the advantage that every little Podunk has a GM dealer (usually Chevrolet). There are counties in Texas that don't have a county health department but they have a Chevy dealer. Maybe they can convince the Chevy dealer to let them give flu shots in the showroom... or will the Ford dealer be more civic-minded?

If I get a compulsion to Buy American, it'll be a Ford. GM has done too much junk over too many years to trust them.
Profile Pic
Lasing
Champion Author Colorado Springs

Posts:11,734
Points:1,844,400
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Sep 8, 2010 11:12:58 AM

Martinman, Agreed. Good post!
Profile Pic
Martinman
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:11,756
Points:1,658,215
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 8:04:08 PM

First, it's General Motors. But unfortunately, some again show how you can't educate stupid.

Second, virtually all major auto manufacturers are multi-national corporations. The difference is in where they are headquartered. That is where the profits are funneled, and a majority of research, design, and testing are done.

Third, to make the assertion that a majority of the parts in all GM vehicles are made in China is an extreme stretch at best. Okay, how about an outright lie.

General Motors has more vehicle assembly plants and parts manufacturing plants in the U.S. than any other auto manufacturer. Ford is a close second. Not Toyota. Not Nissan. Not BMW.

Fourth, while a number of foreign-owned assembly plants have "sprung-up" in the U.S. over the past decade, they have come at a high-cost to American taxpayers. The majority of these assembly plants have received more than A QUARTER BILLION DOLLARS in tax-deferments, tax credits, and other sources of state-level subsidies - at hugh costs to local and county governments. In one case, the property improvements need before plant construction began, were done using NATIONAL GUARD troops. Ya gotta love that, using National Guard troops to benefit a foreign corporation. Thank you Senators Shelby and Sessions of the State of Alabama.
Profile Pic
Sneakers55
Champion Author Houston

Posts:43,327
Points:1,711,955
Joined:Nov 2005
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 4:20:01 PM

latruck wrote:

>GM is American, some people just do not like american companys

The only accurate statement you can make about Government Motors is the headquarters is in the city of Detroit. They've been a multinational for decades now. All they are allowed to say now about their vehicles are "assembled in the United States of globally sourced parts." Wake up, Government Motors fanboys! Most of your Chevrolet came from China!

>or they do not want to help a family send the kids to college, or take a vacation , or buy a house

Greenfield transplant plants have been ramping up faster than Detroit has been shutting down. The last I looked, Honda and Toyota paychecks spent just as well as the kind that Government Motors managed to barf up.

>they want everybody on welfare or unemployment,

About half of the job losses are in construction, a major consumer of those profitable heavy work trucks where Detroit owns 90% of the market. Housing construction got wrongsized, many more new household units than the market can consume. The Baby Boom market isn't going to continue forever.

>American jobs that pay good wages , help pay the taxes , that the super rich avoid.

Social Security only gets collected from earned income. Pensions, interest, dividends, and IRA withdrawals are not earned income. Retire, and you can escape a good bit of taxation!


[Edited by: Sneakers55 at 9/7/2010 5:26:41 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Nicoalbum
Champion Author Ottawa

Posts:3,576
Points:722,260
Joined:Jan 2010
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 4:11:30 PM

Disgusting.
Profile Pic
BMW2014
Champion Author Toronto

Posts:1,794
Points:364,300
Joined:Jun 2010
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 1:27:55 PM

Nothing new. Taxpayers always are on frontline.
Profile Pic
latruck
Rookie Author Indianapolis

Posts:6
Points:158,345
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 1:21:51 PM

GM is American, some people just do not like american companys, or they do not want to help a family send the kids to college, or take a vacation , or buy a house, they want everybody on welfare or unemployment, American jobs that pay good wages , help pay the taxes , that the super rich avoid.
Profile Pic
Night Owl
Champion Author Toronto

Posts:5,260
Points:1,332,750
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 1:16:03 PM

If it weren't for the taxpayers, GM would have gone bankrupt. You would think that GM would be grateful to the U.S. and Canadian taxpayers that saved them. GM should ensure that taxpayers are fully paid back.

[Edited by: Night Owl at 9/7/2010 2:16:24 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Sneakers55
Champion Author Houston

Posts:43,327
Points:1,711,955
Joined:Nov 2005
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 12:19:39 PM

ramammoth wrote:

>So all the naysayers are against GM succeeding? Some patriots.

Government Motors has been failing for decades, anyone who has looked at their market share could come to that conclusion. Things went downhill when they made the mistake of hiring a one-time P&G brand manager who assumed you could make cars like Cheer and Tide. (Hint: the fragrance and the color of the box.)

I suspect the Viability Plans and the new squeaky-clean balance sheet may keep them alive a while longer.

Profile Pic
uglytom
Champion Author Florida

Posts:5,673
Points:1,187,885
Joined:Jul 2007
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 11:54:36 AM

What's new?
Profile Pic
PathfinderSC
Champion Author South Carolina

Posts:7,165
Points:1,365,980
Joined:Mar 2008
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 11:19:49 AM

Most of the time, The Taxpayers are always the losers.
Profile Pic
ramammoth
Champion Author Modesto

Posts:1,389
Points:278,565
Joined:Mar 2007
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 10:05:58 AM

So all the naysayers are against GM succeeding? Some patriots.
Profile Pic
mikaye
Champion Author Cleveland

Posts:1,801
Points:456,570
Joined:Jun 2010
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 10:01:06 AM

why would they make an effort when the government protects them from consequences?
Profile Pic
realtorguzzler
Champion Author Florida

Posts:1,488
Points:259,210
Joined:Jun 2010
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 9:44:15 AM

Pie in the sky.
Profile Pic
afghaned
Champion Author Hamilton

Posts:8,498
Points:820,950
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 9:43:44 AM

Close your eyes, click your heels togetehr three times & repeat over & over - Elections are on the horizon!!!
Profile Pic
Hilsgal
Sophomore Author Utah

Posts:229
Points:235,615
Joined:Oct 2006
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 9:42:43 AM

Did anybody actually expect to get the money back??
Profile Pic
Bussman
Champion Author Dallas

Posts:3,862
Points:991,680
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 9:18:36 AM

Repost.
Profile Pic
dacofa
Champion Author Nevada

Posts:3,211
Points:693,485
Joined:Jan 2010
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 9:16:17 AM

Anytime Obama and his BS is involved we, the taxpayers, lose big time.
Profile Pic
WyrelessMike
All-Star Author Little Rock

Posts:991
Points:426,570
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 9:05:55 AM

Aren't taxpayer "losers" no matter what the government spends their money on? I mean, many will be too young to recall this, but it was once public knowledge that the government would regularly spend $30,000 on a hammer, and the president typically spend $50 on haircuts, etc.

Now, based on predicted results of the initial round of stock sales, Reuters reports taxpayers are losers, even though the story admits that sales over later years may yield the kind of money that would allow, and this is my favorite part, "taxpayers to be fully paid back for saving the world's largest automaker."

Now, I'd like hear to a reply from the taxpayers that really believe the government intends to "fully pay back" the money used to save GM to each taxpayer...

*cue crickets*

Nice try, Reuters, on your attempt to remove the government from the equation.

[Edited by: WyrelessMike at 9/7/2010 10:07:05 AM EST]
Profile Pic
derKraut
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:1,669
Points:848,795
Joined:Dec 2008
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 8:35:44 AM

What a surprise! It is always the taxpayer that takes it up the yingyang.
Profile Pic
ncomet1
Champion Author Michigan

Posts:1,289
Points:408,780
Joined:Nov 2009
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 8:20:25 AM

When you only sell 15-20 Billion dollars worth of stock, its hard to pay back $50 Billion.
Profile Pic
bluehawk43
All-Star Author Arkansas

Posts:679
Points:503,890
Joined:May 2009
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 7:49:55 AM

If they say it often enough maybe it won't happen.
Profile Pic
GingoutMD
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:2,302
Points:473,680
Joined:Jan 2010
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 7:49:34 AM

Anyone who thought that the taxpayer was going to make all their money back when GM went public simply does not understand much about the stock market and the current value of GM.
Profile Pic
Martinman
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:11,756
Points:1,658,215
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 7:42:38 AM

So why keep REPOSTing the same "nutty" old news?
Profile Pic
bar1035
Champion Author Charlotte

Posts:5,813
Points:831,995
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 7:20:43 AM

This is just as useful as a lot of other nutty articles Martinman? The taxpayers are always the losers.
Profile Pic
Martinman
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:11,756
Points:1,658,215
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Sep 7, 2010 7:07:26 AM

REPOST !

Taxpayers likely to face initial loss on GM IPO (Reuters; posted 04 Sep 10)

Please use the "Not Newsworthy" link on the prior page (All Recent News), to notify the moderators of reposts and spamming such as this.



[Edited by: Martinman at 9/7/2010 8:15:32 AM EST]
Post a reply Back to Topics